European Association Of Urology Research Articles

A bicentric retrospective study of the correlation of EAU BCR risk groups with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT detection in prostate cancer biochemical recurrence

The European Association of Urology (EAU) has proposed a risk stratification for patients harboring biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy: ISUP < 4 and PSA doubling time (PSAdt) > 12 months for low risk, and ISUP ≥ 4 or PSAdt ≤ 12 months for high risk. This dual-center retrospective study aims to investigate the correlation between the EAU risk stratification for BCR following radical prostatectomy and the detection rate of lesions using 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Among the 71 included patients (58 high-risk, 13 low-risk), with a median PSA level of 1.43 ng/ml, PET/CT demonstrated a significantly higher positivity in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group (72.4% vs. 38.0%, p = 0.026). Analysis of recurrence sites revealed a similar proportion of pelvic-confined disease in both groups (24.1% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.935), but a significantly higher incidence of metastatic disease in the high-risk group (51.7% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.017), with detailed findings indicating an increased prevalence of bone metastases in the high-risk BCR group (37.8% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.048). Therefore, PSMA PET/CT offers valuable insights for treatment decisions, aligning with the evolving landscape of prostate cancer management.

Which men benefit from prostate cancer screening? Prostate cancer mortality by subgroup in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

To evaluate whether a subgroup of men can be identified that would benefit more from screening than others. This retrospective cohort study was based on three European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) centres, Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden. We identified 126 827 men aged 55-69 years in the study who were followed for maximum of 16 years after randomisation. The primary outcome was prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. We analysed three age groups 55-59, 60-64 and 65-69 years and PCa cases within four European Association of Urology (EAU) risk groups: low, intermediate, high risk, and advanced disease. The hazard ratio (HR) for PCa mortality in the screening arm relative to the control arm for men aged 55-59 years was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.24) in Finland, 0.70 (95% CI 0.44-1.12) in the Netherlands and 0.42 (95% CI 0.24-0.73) in Sweden. The HR for men aged 60-64 years was 1.03 (95% CI 0.77-1.37) in Finland, 0.76 (95% CI 0.50-1.16) in the Netherlands and 0.97 (95% CI 0.64-1.48) in Sweden. The HR for men aged 65-69 years was 0.80 (95% CI 0.62-1.03) in Finland and 0.57 (95% CI 0.38-0.83) in the Netherlands, and this age group was absent in Sweden. In the EAU risk group analysis, PCa mortality rates were materially lower for men with advanced disease at diagnosis in all three countries: 0.67 (95% CI 0.56-0.82) in Finland, 0.28 (95% CI 0.18-0.44) in the Netherlands, and 0.48 (95% CI 0.30-0.78) in Sweden. We were unable to unequivocally identify the optimal age group for screening, as mortality reduction differed among centres and age groups. Instead, the screening effect appears to depend on screening duration, and the number and frequency of screening rounds. PCa mortality reduction by screening is largely attributable to stage shift.

A Comparison of Globally Applied Prognostic Risk Groups and the Prevalence of Metastatic Disease on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer

BackgroundVarious risk classification systems (RCSs) are used globally to stratify newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) into prognostic groups. ObjectiveTo compare the predictive value of different prognostic subgroups (low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease) within the RCSs for detecting metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for primary staging, and to assess whether further subdivision of subgroups would be beneficial. Design, setting, and participantsPatients with newly diagnosed PCa, in whom PSMA-PET/CT was performed between 2017 and 2022, were studied retrospectively. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on four RCSs: European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG), and Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe prevalence of metastatic disease on PSMA-PET/CT was compared among the subgroups within the four RCSs. Results and limitationsIn total, 2630 men with newly diagnosed PCa were studied. Any metastatic disease was observed in 35% (931/2630) of patients. Among patients classified as having intermediate- and high-risk disease, the prevalence of metastases ranged from approximately 12% to 46%. Two RCSs further subdivided these groups. According to the NCCN, metastatic disease was observed in 5.8%, 13%, 22%, and 62% for favorable intermediate-, unfavorable intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk PCa, respectively. Regarding the CPG, these values were 6.9%, 13%, 21%, and 60% for the corresponding risk groups. ConclusionsThis study underlines the importance of nuanced risk stratification, recommending the further subdivision of intermediate- and high-risk disease given the notable variation in the prevalence of metastatic disease. PSMA-PET/CT for primary staging should be reserved for patients with unfavorable intermediate- or higher-risk disease. Patient summaryThe use of various risk classification systems in patients with prostate cancer helps identify those at a higher risk of having metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging.

Peri- and post-operative outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy after the implementation of the EAU guidelines recommendations for collecting and reporting complications at a high-volume referral center.

No studies relied on a standardized methodology to collect postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). The aim of our study was to evaluate peri- and post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing RARC adhering to the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations for reporting surgical outcomes and using a long postoperative follow-up. 246 patients who underwent RARC with intracorporal urinary diversion at a single tertiary referral center with a postoperative follow-up ≥ 1year for survivors. Postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively by interviews done by medical doctors. Complications were scored using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CD), grouped by type and severity (severe: CD score ≥ 3). We described peri- and post-operative outcomes and complication chronological distribution. Overall, 16 (6.5%) and 225 patients (91%) experienced intraoperative and postoperative complications, respectively. Moreover, 139 (57%) experienced severe complications. The most common any-grade and severe complications were infectious (72%) and genitourinary (35%), respectively. Overall, 52% of complications (358/682) occurred within 10days from surgery, and 51% of severe complications (106/207) occurred within 35days. However, 13% of complications (90/682) and 28% of severe complications (59/207) occurred 3months after surgery. The earliest complications were fever of unknown origins and paralytic ileus (median time-to-complication [mTTC]: 4days), the latest complications were urinary tract infection (mTTC: 40days) and hydronephrosis/ureteral obstruction (mTTC: 70days). The rate of postoperative complications after RARC is > 90% when a standardized collection method and a long follow-up is implemented. These results should be used to identify potential areas of improvement and for preoperative patient counseling.

The 2012 Briganti nomogram predicts disease progression after surgery in high-risk prostate cancer patients

ABSTRACT Objectives We tested whether the 2012 Briganti nomogram for the risk of pelvic lymph node invasion (PLNI) may represent a predictor of disease progression after surgical management in high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients according to the European Association of Urology. Methods Between January 2013 and December 2021, HR PCa patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) were identified. The 2012 Briganti nomogram was evaluated as a continuous and categorical variable, which was dichotomized using the median. The risk of disease progression, defined as the event of biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence/distant metastases was assessed by Cox regression models. Results Overall, 204 patients were identified. The median 2012 Briganti nomogram score resulted 12.0% (IQR: 6.0–22.0%). PLNI was detected in 57 (27.9%) cases. Compared to patients who had preoperatively a 2012 Briganti nomogram score ≤12%, those with a score >12% were more likely to present with higher percentage of biopsy positive cores, palpable tumors at digital rectal examination, high-grade cancers at prostate biopsies, and unfavorable pathology in the surgical specimen. At multivariable Cox regression analyses, disease progression, which occurred in 85 (41.7%) patients, was predicted by the 2012 Briganti nomogram score (HR: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.00–1.03; p = 0.012), independently by tumors presenting as palpable (HR: 1.78; 95%CI: 1.10.2.88; p = 0.020) or the presence of PLNI in the surgical specimen (HR: 3.73; 95%CI: 2.10–5.13; p = 0.012). Conclusions The 2012 Briganti nomogram represented an independent predictor of adverse prognosis in HR PCa patients treated with RARP and ePLND. As the score increased, so patients were more likely to experience disease progression, independently by the occurrence of PLNI. The association between the nomogram, unfavorable pathology and tumor behavior might turn out to be useful for selecting a subset of patients needing different treatment paradigms in HR disease.

Comparison of European and American Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: How Are They different?

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) affecting the urinary tract is recognized as one of the prevalent types of cancer, ranking fifth in terms of incidence. However, it is important to note that upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), in comparison to bladder cancer, is relatively uncommon and represents a minority of UC cases, accounting for ∼5% to 10%. It is worth emphasizing that as much as 60% of UTUC cases are invasive at the time of diagnosis, in contrast to 25% of bladder cancer cases. These statistics highlight the urgent need for well-designed, multidisciplinary strategies to guide optimal management for this vulnerable patient population, aiming to control treatment variability and minimize the risks associated with undertreatment and overtreatment. Methods: In this study, we present a comparative analysis of the contemporary guidelines on UTUC management from the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Urological Association/Society of Urologic Oncology (AUA/SUO) released in 2023. Our objective is to contrast the different guidelines and examine the evidence on which their recommendations are based. Results: By thoroughly reviewing the guidelines from both organizations, we observed substantial agreement on the management of UTUC. However, we also identified noticeable differences among these guidelines, leading to a wide range of recommendations. These disparities might stem from variations in clinical practices, regional preferences, and the availability of resources. It is crucial to acknowledge that both the EAU and AUA/SUO base their guidelines on the latest scientific evidence and expert consensus within their respective regions. Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of ongoing collaboration, knowledge exchange, and harmonization of guidelines to improve the standard of care for UTUC globally. Future research should focus on identifying areas of consensus and bridging the gaps between different international guidelines to enhance the management outcomes for this challenging disease.

Prediction models for postoperative renal function after living donor nephrectomy: a systematic review.

Living-donor nephrectomy (LDN) is the most valuable source of organs for kidney transplantation worldwide. The current preoperative evaluation of a potential living donor candidate does not take into account formal estimation of postoperative renal function decline after surgery using validated prediction models. The aim of this study was to summarize the available models to predict the mid- to long-term renal function following LDN, aiming to support both clinicians and patients during the decision-making process. A systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted following the principles highlighted by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines and following the PRISMA 2020 recommendations. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO on December 10, 2022 (registration ID: CRD42022380198). In the qualitative analysis we selected the models including only preoperative variables. After screening and eligibility assessment, six models from six studies met the inclusion criteria. All of them relied on retrospective patient cohorts. According to PROBAST, all studies were evaluated as high risk of bias. The models included different combinations of variables (ranging between two to four), including donor-/kidney-related factors, and preoperative laboratory tests. Donor age was the variable more often included in the models (83%), followed by history of hypertension (17%), Body Mass Index (33%), renal volume adjusted by body weight (33%) and body surface area (33%). There was significant heterogeneity in the model building strategy, the main outcome measures and the model's performance metrics. Three models were externally validated. Few models using preoperative variables have been developed and externally validated to predict renal function after LDN. As such, the evidence is premature to recommend their use in routine clinical practice. Future research should be focused on the development and validation of user-friendly, robust prediction models, relying on granular large multicenter datasets, to support clinicians and patients during the decision-making process.

The ERUS course on robot-assisted kidney transplantation

PurposeRobot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) is being increasingly performed at selected referral institutions worldwide. Yet, surgical training in RAKT is still unstructured and not grounded into formal credentialing courses including simulation, lab facilities, and modular training with animal models. As such, developing standardized, modular training programs is warranted to provide surgeons with the RAKT-specific skillset needed for a “safe” learning curve.MethodsThe 3-day course on RAKT developed at the EAU Skills Center in Orsi Academy was designed as a standardized, modular, step-by-step approach aiming to provide theoretical and practical skills. The course is held by expert proctors with extensive experience in RAKT. To maximize the course’s usefulness, a solid knowledge of robotics and transplantation is desirable for participants.ResultsFrom January 2016 to July 2023, 87 surgeons from 23 countries (of which 36% from extra-European countries) participated in the RAKT course performed at the EAU Skills Center in Orsi Academy. Of these, 58/87 (67%) were urologists, while 27/87 (31%) were general surgeons and 2/87 (2%) were vascular surgeons. To date, 18 participants (20.6%) are actively involved in RAKT programs at institutions included in the European Association of Urology (EAU) Robotic Urology Section (ERUS)–RAKT network.ConclusionLeveraging the potential of simulation, wet-lab training, live porcine models, and experienced proctors, the RAKT course performed at the EAU Skills Center in Orsi Academy represents the first structured teaching effort aiming to offer surgeons a full immersion in RAKT to train the core technical skills.

PECULIARITIES OF DYSURIA TREATMENT IN MEN WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Objective of the work is to analyze the practical aspects of medical treatment of urination disorders in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Results. Recently, more and more patients with BPH are being treated conservatively due to the increased availability of drug therapy. Traditional alpha-blockers (AB) do not always have a sufficient effect in reducing dysuria in such patients. In recent years, a number of new treatment options have been introduced into the Guidelines of the European Association of Urology (EAU) for the diagnosis and treatment of non-neurogenic voiding disorders - phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors and beta-3 adrenomimetics have been added to cholinolytics (CL). These groups of drugs have different mechanisms of action, and some of the recommended drugs (such as CL) help relax the bladder wall and have traditionally been used in women with symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB). CL has been well studied in this category of patients both in terms of safety and efficacy. At the same time, when used in men with BPH, especially in the presence of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), there remains the question of safety in terms of worsening urination. Although most current studies do not demonstrate an increased risk of acute urinary retention as a side effect, a number of recommendations should be followed for safe treatment of such patients. It is recommended to use CL in patients with severe and moderate urinary disorders with a predominance of irritative symptoms. However, the size of the prostate gland is not a criterion for the use of CL. Conducting urodynamic studies is also not recommended to determine the necessity or safety of one or another treatment option, they are reserved only for complicated cases or when neurogenic urination disorders are suspected. Conclusions. Complex urodynamic studies are not routinely used, while uroflowmetry should be used as a method of general evaluation of urination efficiency, diagnosis of BPO and effectiveness of patient treatment. Residual urine should be determined before taking the drugs (it is recommended that it not exceed 150 ml) and after a week of treatment.

(PM-04) EFFECTS OF VIBRATORY STIMULATION AND VACUUM ERECTION DEVICE IN THE TREATMENT OF MALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTIONS: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Abstract Introduction Erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, retrograde ejaculation, delayed ejaculation, anejaculation, painful ejaculation, anorgasmia, hematospermia and low sexual desire are the main male sexual dysfunctions. The 2022 European Association of Urology recommends the use of vibratory stimulation and vacuum erection devices in the treatment of male sexual dysfunctions (mainly anejaculation and erectile dysfunction), both as adjuvant therapy and as combination therapy with other interventions. The objective of the study was to verify if there is scientific evidence for the use of vibrating stimulation and the vacuum erection device in male sexual dysfunctions that allow clinical indication in an effective and safe manner. Methods Literature review by searching for scientific articles in the Pubmed database of the National Library of Medicine published in the last 10 years, including randomized clinical trials, meta-analysis studies, pilot studies, systematic literature reviews and guidelines. Results As a result 1,230 articles on male sexual dysfunction. After screening, 16 studies were selected that are part of this research, seven articles on vibratory stimulation and nine on vacuum erection devices. Conclusion This review suggests that vacuum erection and vibratory stimulation devices, as they offer low risk, minimal side effects, are accessible and cost-effective compared to other approaches, are promising devices for the non-invasive treatment of male dysfunctions. sex. Other studies with greater methodological rigor are needed. Descriptors Vibratory stimulation; sexual dysfunction; penis vibrator; male sexual dysfunction; vacuum erectile; vacuum erection; Peyronie's disease Financing No conflict.

Whole-body tumour burden on [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: association with tumour biology and PSA kinetics.

The objective was to assess the association between molecular imaging (mi) variables on [18F]DCFPyL-PET/CT with clinical and disease characteristics and prostate specific antigen (PSA) related variables in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BRPC). We analysed patients with BRPC after radical treatment. We obtained clinical and PSA variables: International Society of Urology Pathology (ISUP) grade group, European Association of Urology (EAU) risk classification, PSA (PSA≤1ng/ml, 1<PSA≤2, PSA>2), PSA doubling time (PSAdt) and PSA velocity (PSAvel). All PET/CT scans were reviewed with the assistance of automated Prostate Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (aPROMISE) software and lesions' segmentation in positive scans was performed using this platform. Standardized uptake value (SUV) derived variables; tumour burden variables [whole-body tumour volume (wbTV), whole-body tumour lesion activity (wbTLA) and whole-body mi PSMA (wbPSMA)] and miTNM staging were obtained. Cut-off of PSA and kinetics able to predict PET/CT results were obtained. Associations between disease and mi variables were analysed using ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman's correlation tests. Multivariate analysis was also performed. Two hundred and seventy-five patients were studied. [18F]DCFPyL-PET/CT were positive in 165/275 patients. In multivariate analysis, moment of biochemical recurrence, ISUP group, PSA level and PSAvel showed significant association with the detection rate. miTNM showed significant association with PSA level (p<0.001) and kinetics (p<0.001), being higher in patients with metastatic disease. Both PSA and PSAvel showed moderate correlation with wbTV, wbTLA and wbPSMA (p<0.001). A weak correlation with SUVs was found. Mean wbTV, wbTLA and wbPSMA values were significantly higher in PSA > 2ng/ml, PSAdt ≤ 6 months and PSAvel ≥ 0.2ng/ml/month groups. Also, wbTV (p=0.039) and wbPSMA (p=0.020) were significantly higher in patients with ISUP grade group 5. PSA and PSAvel cut-offs (1.15 ng/ml and 0.065 ng/ml/month) were significantly associated with a positive PET/CT. Higher PSA values, unfavourable PSA kinetics and ISUP grade group 5 were robust predictive variables of larger tumour burden variables on [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT assessed by aPROMISE platform.

Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: Guideline of Guidelines.

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease with a potentially dismal prognosis. We systematically compared international guidelines on UTUC to analyze similitudes and differences among them. We conducted a search on MEDLINE/PubMed for guidelines related to UTUC from 2010 to the present. In addition, we manually explored the websites of urological and oncological societies and journals to identify pertinent guidelines. We also assessed recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Network, the Canadian Urological Association, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the International Consultation on Bladder Cancer, considering their expertise and experience in the field. Among all the sources, only the American Urologist Association (AUA), European Association of Urology (EAU), and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines specifically report data on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of UTUC. Current analysis reveals several differences between all three sources on diagnostic work-up, patient management, and follow-up. Among all, AUA and EAU guidelines show more detailed indications. Despite the growing incidence of UTUC, only AUA, EAU, and NCCN guidelines deal with this cancer. Our research depicted high variability in reporting recommendations and opinions. In this regard, we encourage further higher-quality research to gain evidence creating higher grade consensus between guidelines.

European association of urology risk stratification predicts outcome in patients receiving PSMA-PET-planned salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy

PurposeThe European Association of Urology (EAU) proposed a risk stratification (high vs. low risk) for patients with biochemical recurrence (BR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Here we investigated whether this stratification accurately predicts outcome, particularly in patients staged with PSMA-PET. MethodsFor this study, we used a retrospective database including 1222 PSMA-PET-staged prostate cancer patients who were treated with salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for BR, at 11 centers in 5 countries. Patients with lymph node metastases (pN1 or cN1) or unclear EAU risk group were excluded. The remaining cohort comprised 526 patients, including 132 low-risk and 394 high-risk patients. ResultsThe median follow-up time after SRT was 31.0 months. The 3-year biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) was 85.7 % in EAU low-risk versus 69.4 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.002). The 3-year metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 94.4 % in low-risk versus 87.6 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.005). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 99.0 % in low-risk versus 99.6 % in high-risk patients (p = 0.925). In multivariate analysis, EAU risk group remained a statistically significant predictor of BPFS (p = 0.003, HR 2.022, 95 % CI 1.262–3.239) and MFS (p = 0.013, HR 2.986, 95 % CI 1.262–7.058). ConclusionOur data support the EAU risk group definition. EAU risk grouping for BCR reliably predicted outcome in patients staged lymph node-negative after RP and with PSMA-PET before SRT. To our knowledge, this is the first study validating the EAU risk grouping in patients treated with PSMA-PET-planned SRT.

(215) Investigating if Hormonal Dysfunctions are Risk Factors in Men Complaining of Premature Ejaculation

Abstract Introduction Most epidemiological studies suggest that premature ejaculation (PE), also referred to as early ejaculation and rapid ejaculation, may be the most common male sexual disorder. The exact etiology of PE is unknown. Psychological/behavioristic and biogenic etiologies have been proposed. Objective Initial reports indicate that there are hormone differences between men with primary (lifelong) and secondary (acquired) PE. This study was designed to investigate hormone profiles of these two subgroups. Methods Men who presented to our outpatient clinic with PE were enrolled in this study. The diagnosis and classification (primary or secondary) of PE was based on patient medical and sexual history according to guidelines of international society of sexual medicine (ISSM) and European association of urology (EAU). Complete physical examination was done and we measured thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), testosterone (T), and prolactin (P) for all patients. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and independent-measures t-test for univariate analyses. Analysis of covariance was used for multivariable analyses. Results 506 men were included in this analysis. The average age of these men was 44±12 years old and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.7±5.5. The mean levels of T, TSH, and P for the entire sample was 4.38±1.69, 2.31±3.56, and 10.56±11.04, respectively. There were 267 men in the primary PE group and 239 men in the secondary PE group. The men with primary PE were significantly younger than those with secondary PE (37±11 vs. 52±12, p=0.001). There were no significant differences in BMI between the groups. On univariate analyses, there was no differences between the primary PE and secondary PE groups in T (4.39±1.66 vs. 4.38±1.84, p=0.94), TSH (2.31±4.89 vs. 2.20±2.07, p=0.76), and P (10.65±8.13 vs. 10.46±13.46, p=0.86). When controlling for age in multivariable analyses, there continued to be no differences between the two groups (p values ranging from p=0.56 to 0.81). Conclusions hormonal profile including T, TSH and P seem to be in the normal range in men with PE and there is no statistical difference in these hormones between primary and secondary PE Disclosure No.

Nurse-led renal cell carcinoma clinic: a single center review.

In 2015 our centre introduced a nurse-led renal cell cancer follow-up protocol and clinic for patients who have undergone partial or radical nephrectomy for organ-confined kidney tumours. The main aims of this clinic were to improve healthcare efficiency and standardize follow-up processes. The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of a nurse-led renal cell cancer follow up clinic in regard to surveillance protocol compliance and the timely identification and appropriate management of recurrences. A secondary objective was to evaluate this locally developed follow up protocol against the current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines surveillance protocol. All patients who underwent a partial or radical nephrectomy between 2015 and 2021 at a single Western Australia institution for a primary renal malignancy were included. Data was collected from local clinical information systems and protocol adherence, recurrence characteristics and management were assessed. The current EAU guidelines were applied to the cohort to assess differences in risk-stratification and theoretical outcomes between the protocols. After a mean follow up period of 31.2 months (range 0-77 months), 75.5% (185/245) of patients had all follow up imaging and reviews within 1 month of the timeframe scheduled on the protocol. 17.1% (42/245) had a delay in their follow up of more than a month at some stage, 5.7% (14/245) did not attend for follow up but had documented attempts to facilitate their compliance, and 0.4% (1/245) were lost to follow up with no evidence of attempted contact. 15.5% (38/245) of patients had recurrence of malignancy detected during follow up and these were all discussed in a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting. The recurrence rate was 2.5% (3/119) for low risk, 17.7% (14/79) for intermediate risk, and 44.7% (21/47) for high risk patients when they were re-stratified according to EAU risk categories. No recurrences were detected through ultrasound (USS) or chest x-ray (CXR) in this cohort and our protocol tended to place patients in higher risk-stratification groups as compared to current EAU guidelines. Nurse-led renal cell cancer follow up is a safe, reliable and effective clinical framework that has significant benefits in regard to resource utilization. USS and CXR are ineffective in detecting recurrence and Computerized tomography (CT) should be considered the imaging modality of choice for this purpose. The EAU surveillance protocol appears superior to our protocol, and we have therefore transitioned to the EAU guideline protocol going forward.

Cancer centers of excellence for the multidisciplinary management of urologic cancers: The intersection between education, research, and healthcare.

Urologic cancers are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the world, representing more than 10% of the total number of new cancer cases worldwide. These complex diseases are linked to several issues related to their diagnosis, management, monitoring, and treatment - issues that require multidisciplinary solutions that encompass and manage patients as complex entities. In response to this, the so-called cancer centers of excellence (CCEs) emerged, defined as multidisciplinary institutions specialized in the diagnosis, management, monitoring, and treatment of specific diseases, including cancer. Different institutions, such as the European Association of Urology (EAU), have proposed and encouraged its consolidation, especially for the management of prostate cancer. These institutions must be composed of three areas: healthcare, education, and research, which have complementary interactions and relationships, stimulating research and problem-solving from a multidisciplinary approach and also covering elements of basic sciences and mental health. The implementation of these CCEs has brought positive results; therefore, it is necessary to stimulate their implementation with a uro-oncologic approach.

Surgical treatment of cryptorchidism: current insights and future directions.

Cryptorchidism presents with an incidence of 1-5% with potential long-term implications on future fertility and overall health. This review focuses on surgical treatment modalities, their impact on testicular development, and function while addressing the Nordic consensus statement as well as current European Association of Urology (EAU) and American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines. Congenital and acquired cryptorchidism present distinctive challenges in surgical management, with different implications for fertility. While congenital cryptorchidism entails a risk to fertility and warrants early intervention, both retractile testes and acquired cryptorchidism also pose risks to fertility potential, underscoring the importance of evaluating treatment options. Testicular location and the child's age form the basis of a practical classification system for undescended testicles. Early diagnosis by clinical examination enables timely treatment. Imaging is reserved for selected cases only. Following guidelines, orchidopexy is recommended between 6-12 months of age for congenital cryptorchidism. Evidence increasingly suggests the benefits of early surgery for promoting testicular health and fertility potential. Current surgical options range from open to laparoscopic techniques, with the choice largely determined by the location and accessibility of the undescended testicle. The advancement in laparoscopic approaches for non-palpable testes underscores the evolving landscape of surgical treatment. Sequential surgeries may be required depending on the mobility of the undescended testes. More research is needed to explore both the potential and limitations of hormonal therapy, which is secondary to surgical treatment and can selectively have a role as adjunct to surgery. Long-term follow-up is imperative to evaluate fertility outcomes, risk of testicular malignancy, and psychological impact. By integrating current guidelines with the latest evidence, this review intends to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of cryptorchidism, thereby optimizing patient management and outcomes.

Current Approaches for the Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence - A Guideline of Guidelines

Urologists utilize evidence-based guidelines organized by urological organizations in the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The objective of this study is to provide guidance in the clinical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by reviewing key guidelines. We conducted a medical literature analysis in the following databases: PubMed, Medline, Embase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Cochrane Library. We also manually searched the websites of the following international and national societies to identify relevant guidelines for inclusion in this review: the International Consultation on Incontinence, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Urogynecologic Society, American Urological Association/Society of Urodynamic, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, European Association of Urology, and Canadian Urological Association. The recommendations in the guidelines are summarized in different areas, including the diagnostic standards of SUI, examination and evaluation methods, and conservative treatment methods. This ‘guideline of guidelines’ presents the similarities and differences between prominent authorities in the management of SUI.

Combined surgical and chemotherapy treatment for invasive primary urethral cancer: a case presentation

BackgroundThe European Association of Urology (EAU) defines primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) as a carcinoma that arises in the urethra without a previous diagnosis of carcinoma elsewhere in the urinary system. It is considered as a rare cancer, accounting for less than 1% of all malignant tumors and 5% of malignant tumors of the urinary system. The difficulty in diagnosis and its rarity can lead to delayed diagnosis and decreased survival. We think that a case report to be made in the literature for this rare disease with no consensus on treatment will contribute to disease management.Case presentationIn this article, we describe the diagnosis and treatment process of a 75-year-old patient who was diagnosed with primary urethral cancer and had urethral discharge and difficulty in urination. The biopsy result from the suspected hyperemic area in the urethra in cystourethroscopy was primary urethral cancer. Urethrectomy followed by urethroplasty was performed on the patient's 2-cm primary urethral cancerous tissue. In the postoperative first month, an F-18 FDG whole-body PET scan for oncological evaluation showed increased pathological F-18 FDG uptake in the periphery of the mass in the penile urethra and indistinguishable boundaries from the prostatic urethra. After this, adjuvant gemcitabine and carboplatin therapy was planned by the oncology team.ConclusionsBased on our outcome in this case, we believe that chemotherapy combined with surgery increases the chance of successful treatment in locally advanced urethral cancer.

EAU RISK GROUPS APPLIED ON PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - ANALYSIS OF PATHOLOGY SPECIMENS AND PATIENT SURVIVAL

Purpose: The European Association of Urology (EAU) classifies patients with prostate cancer into three risk groups - low-risk, intermediate- and high-risk depending on the probability of biochemical progression after treatment with curative intent (either radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy). The aim of the present study is to analyze our experience with patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and to look for the relationship between the pathological results from the operation and the distribution of patients into risk groups. Material/Methods: A single-center, non-interventional study was conducted. The study was performed after analysis of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (either open or laparoscopic) at the Clinic of Urology in St. Anna Hospital in Varna. The number of patients available for analysis was 201. Data were analyzed with IBM SPSS version 23. Results: We found that high-risk patients had unfavorable results from the examination of the pathology specimens- patients with pT3a and pT3b were more often from the high-risk group. High-risk patients were also at increased risk of PSA progression and development of distant metastases. Conclusions: The EAU-risk groups will probably undergo changes connected with the improved methods for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. But still, it is a valid tool which correctly predicts the unfavorable pathology of the removed specimen and also the risk of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.